city_hall

Official websites use .boston.gov

A .boston.gov website belongs to an official government organization in the City of Boston.

lock

Secure .gov websites use HTTPS

A lock or https:// means you've safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.

Last updated:

Zoning Board of Appeal Hearing

The June 4, 2024, hearing will be held virtually via video teleconference and telephone via the Zoom Webinar event platform.

Please be advised of the following appeals to be heard on June 4, 2024, beginning at 9:30 a.m. and related announcements. All matters listed on this June 4, 2024, hearing agenda have been noticed in accordance with the enabling act.

Please be advised of the following participation instructions: The June 4, 2024, hearing will be held virtually via video teleconference and telephone via the zoom webinar event platform. Interested persons can participate in the hearing REMOTELY by going to our online meeting. You may also participate by phone by calling into the Zoom Webinar at 301-715-8592 and entering the Webinar ID: 819 2218 4516 followed by # when prompted.

If you wish to offer testimony on an appeal, please sign up online. Please provide your name, address, the address and/or BOA number of the appeal on which you wish to speak, and if you wish to speak in support of or opposition to the project.

For individuals who need translation assistance, please notify the Board at least 48 HOURS in advance either by signing up online, calling 617-635-4775, or emailing zba.ambassador@boston.gov.

The ZBA Ambassador will be available within the Zoom Webinar Event from 8:30 - 9:30 a.m. to answer questions about ZBA procedures and offer instructions on how to participate in the hearing via Zoom. Questions and/or concerns can also be emailed to the ZBA Ambassador at zba.ambassador@boston.gov.

If you wish to offer comment within the meeting platform, please use the “Raise Hand” function that should appear on the bottom of your screen, if connected by computer or device, or dial *9, if connected by phone. On a computer or device, you will receive a request to unmute yourself from the event host. You must select yes before you can speak. On a phone, you will hear a prompt that the event host is asking you to unmute yourself. You must press *6 to unmute yourself before you can speak. Commenters will be asked to state their name, address and comment. Comments will be limited as time requires.

If you wish to offer testimony on an appeal, please log in to the hearing no later than 8:30 a.m. to ensure your connection is properly functioning.

The hearing can also be viewed via livestream on the City ’s website. Closed captioning is available. Interested persons who are unable to participate in the hearing remotely may make an appointment to offer testimony. Please notify the Board at least 48 HOURS in advance either by calling 617-635-4775 or emailing isdboardofappeal@boston.gov for accommodations to be made.

Members of the community are strongly encouraged to help facilitate the virtual hearing process by emailing letters in support of or opposition to an appeal to zbapublicinput@boston.gov in lieu of offering testimony online. It is strongly encouraged that written comments be submitted to the board at least 48 hours prior to the hearing. When doing so, please include in the subject line the BOA number, the address of the proposed project and the date of the hearing.

The public can offer testimony.

Discussion Topics

  1. EXTENSIONS: 9:30AM

    Case: BOA-1163709 Address: 60-84 Saint Botolph Street Ward 4 Applicant: Joe Bamberg

    Case: BOA-1318050 Address: 90 Braintree Street Ward 22 Applicant: Jared Eigerman, Esq

  2. DISCUSSION OF OPEN MEETING LAW COMPLAINT

    DISCUSSION OF OPEN MEETING LAW COMPLAINT APRIL 30, 2024 HEARING ON 100 SAINT ALPHONSUS BOA1570022/ERT1559532 APPEAL

  3. BOARD FINAL ARBITER: 9:30AM

    Case: BOA-1332095 Address: 130 Marginal Street Ward 1 Applicant: Matthew Eckel, ESQ

  4. GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT & BUILDING CODE: 9:30AM

    Case: BOA-1576263 Address: 14 Claremont Park Ward 4 Applicant: Joseph Holland

    Article(s): Art. 32 Sec. 04 GCOD Applicability- located above fourth story

    Purpose: Restore occupancy back to a legal single family. Full gut remodel of existing building, Demo rear addition and parlor balcony, Reconfigure rear of building (no expansion of GSF). reconfigure parlor deck. New fire suppression system. New GCOD system. Install a new roof deck.



    Case: BOA#1576262 Address: 14 Claremont Park Ward 4 Applicant: Joseph Holland

    Purpose: Restore occupancy back to a legal single family. Full gut remodel of existing building, Demo rear addition and parlor balcony, Reconfigure rear of building (no expansion of GSF). reconfigure parlor deck. New fire suppression system. New GCOD system. Install a new roof deck.

    Violation Violation Description Violation Comments

    9th Edition 780 CMR CHPT Chapter 10 Section 1011.12.2 ROOF ACCESS /Egress to an 10 occupied roof located above fourth story

  5. GROUNDWATER CONSERVATION OVERLAY DISTRICT ONLY: 9:30AM

    Case: BOA-1589398 Address: 25 Gove Street Ward 1 Applicant: East Boston Neighborhood Health Center Corporation

    Article(s): Art. 32 Sec. 32 4Groundwater Conservation Overlay District, Applicability - GCOD

    Purpose: The development includes the demolition of the current residential structure at 25 Gove Street and the reconfiguring of the existing parking lot on 81, 83, 85, 87 Paris Street, and 21 23 Gove Street Parcels to include the 25 Gove Street Parcel. Demolition permit to be applied for separately.



    Case: BOA-1576714 Address: 323 Commonwealth Avenue Ward 5 Applicant: 323 Commonwealth Avenue LLC

    Article(s): Article 32, Section 4. GCOD, Applicability

    Purpose: Change of occupancy from 10 to 2 units. Scope includes framing new floor systems/walls, plumbing, electrical, HVAC, fire protection, fire alarm, elevator for unit 2, board and plaster, tile, hardwood floor, millwork, and painting. No exterior work. No Rebuilding, just occupancy will be changing from 10 units to 2.

  6. HEARINGS: 9:30AM

    Case: BOA-1589719 Address: 66 Homer Street Ward 1 Applicant: Trichilo Development LLC

    Article(s): Art. 53, Section 8 - Use: Forbidden Multifamily Dwelling Forbidden Article 53, Section 9Rear Yard Insufficient Article 53, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient Article 53, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Feet) Article 53, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) Article 53, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 53, Section 57.2 Conformity Ex Bldg Alignment Article 53, Section 56.5(a) Off Street Pkg Maneuverability Art. 53, Section 56 Off Street Parking Insufficient

    Purpose: Erect a three (3) story, five (5) unit residential dwelling, with five (5) garage parking spaces and two (2) private roof decks. Raze the existing building on a separate permit.



    Case: BOA-1563643 Address: 181 Maverick Street Ward 1 Applicant: 91-93 Orleans Street, LLC

    Article(s): Article 53, Section 9 Add'l Lot Area Insufficient - You need relief from the BOA for the said violations Article 53, Section 56Off Street Parking & Loading Req - You need relief from the BOA for the said violations Article 53, Section 9 Usable Open Space Insufficient Article 53, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) Article 53, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Feet) Article 53, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 53, Section 9 Rear Yard Insufficient - You need relief from the BOA for the said violations Art.53 Sec. 08 Use: Forbidden - Art. 27GE Boston IPOD - Art. 32 Sec. 32 4Groundwater Conservation Overlay District, Applicability - You need relief from the BOA for the said violations Article 25A Section4 CFROD Applicability

    Purpose: Erect a four (4) story four (4) unit residential dwelling NOMINAL FEE REQUESTED



    Case: BOA-1589704 Address: 117 Addison Street Ward 1 Applicant: Francis Gomes

    Article(s): Art. 53, Section 25 Use: Forbidden - MFR Forbidden Article 53 Section 26Dimensional Regulations - Rear Yard Insufficient Transitional Zone Article 53, Section 56.5(a) Off Street Pkg Maneuverability Art. 53, Section 56 Off Street Parking Insufficient

    Purpose: Erect a 4 story, six (6) unit, residential dwelling with four (4) parking spaces, as per plans. Raze the existing building on a separate permit.



    Case: BOA-1581050 Address: 6 Nearen Row Ward 2 Applicant: Fraser Allan

    Article(s): Art. 62 Sec. 25 Roof Structure Restrictions - Roof structure restriction Article 62, Section 8 Rear Yard Insufficient - Rear yard insufficient.

    Purpose: Amendment to long form ALT 1526818, proposed dormers



    Case: BOA-1535146 Address: 23 Clark Street Ward 3 Applicant: Michael DelloRusso

    Article(s): Article 54, Section 10 Usable Open Space Insufficient Art. 54 Section 21Off Street Parking Insufficient

    Purpose: Amending ALT1404102. Change of occupancy from nine apartments and store to ten apartments. Reconfiguration of ground floor to add new unit. New ground floor windows with adjustment to front façade. Fire protection and cost reflected on ALT1404102



    Case: BOA-1572734 Address: 36-38 Elm Hill Park Ward 12 Applicant: Mike Loffredo

    Article(s): Article 50, Section 29 Side Yard Insufficient Article 50, Section 29 Front Yard Insufficient Art. 50, Section 43 Off Street Parking Insufficient

    Purpose: New curb cut and driveway. Existing structures remain as is.



    Case: BOA-1557204 Address: 26 Winthrop Street Ward 12 Applicant: Mekane Hiwot St. Michael Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahido Church

    Article(s): Art. 50 Sec. 44 Dimensional Requirements - Insufficient side yard setback

    Purpose: Make a computer room legal. Structure is already built and are trying to get it approved. Clarification: Proposed legalization/Installation of a 377SF (13' x 29') detached accessory building in rear yard for the proposed legal use as an accessory computer room with an 8' 3" ceiling. *Legal use of the main building/Counter#1 CHURCH #ALT1407700/2022

  7. HEARINGS: 11:00AM

    Case: BOA#1565805 Address: 40 Concord Square Ward 4 Applicant: Alpine Advisory Services

    Purpose: Change occupancy to two units. Renovate per plans.to include roof deck/ rear decks as per plans

    Violation Violation Description Violation Comments

    1009.12.1 Roof Access 9th 780 CMR 1011.12.2 Roof access: Where a stairway is provided to a roof, access to the roof shall be provided through a penthouse complying with section 1510.2 Exception: In buildings without an occupied roof, access shall be permitted to be a roof hatch or trap door not less than 16 square feet ( 1.5 m2 ) in an area and having a minimum dimension of 2 feet



    Case: BOA-1565797 Address: 40 Concord Square Ward 4 Applicant: Alpine Advisory Services

    Article(s): Article 64, Section 34 Roof Structure Restrictions Article 64, Section 8 Use: Conditional

    Art. 32 Sec. 04 GCOD Applicability

    Purpose: Change occupancy to two units. Renovate per plans.to include roof deck/ rear decks as per plans



    Case: BOA-1568134 Address: 283 Longwood Avenue Ward 4 Applicant: Rachel Alexander

    Article(s): Art. 08 Sec. 04 Forbidden Use

    Purpose: Request to use a drop off shoulder adjacent to the building for food trucks.



    Case: BOA-1589854 Address: 26 Roseclair Street Ward 7 Applicant: Bond Worthington

    Article(s): Article 65, Section 32Neighborhood Design Overlay Districts Art.65 Sec. 8Use: Forbidden - Multifamily

    Article 65, Section 9 Lot Width Insufficient - Min required: 50' Proposed: 44.13' Article 65, Section 9 Lot Frontage Insufficient - Min required: 50’ Proposed: 44.13' Article 65, Section 9Floor Area Ratio Excessive - Max. allowed: 0.5 Existing: 0.77 Proposed: 0.9 Article 65, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) - Max. allowed: 2.5 Existing:2 Proposed: 3 Article 65, Section 9 Front Yard Insufficient - Min. required: 15' Proposing a 3rd floor front deck. Article 65, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient - Min. required: 10’ Proposed: 8.8' (R) and 5.5' (L) Article 65, Section 39 Screening & Buffering Req - Roof mounted mechanical equipment shall be located in the center of the roof.

    Purpose: Convert two family to three family dwelling. Remove existing roof and half story to construct full third floor addition. Remove existing two story rear deck and construct new three story rear deck with exterior stair. New third floor deck facing Roseclair street.



    Case: BOA-1596026 Address: 104 Norwell Street Ward 14 Applicant: Dorchester Design Collaborative-MOH

    Article(s): Art. 65 Sec. 08 Forbidden - MFR-Forbidden Art.65 Sec. 42 Two or more dwelling on the same lot - Three proposed/Non-compliant Article 65, Section 41 Off-Street Parking & Loading Req - Insufficient parking Article 65, Section 9 Insufficient lot size -5000sf req./building Article 65, Section 9 Excessive f.a.r- .5 max Article 65, Section 9 Max allowed height has been exceeded -35'max Article 65, Section 9 Insufficient front yard setback -15' min req. Article 65, Section 9 Insufficient side yard setback -10'L/s and 20' R/s required

    Purpose: This submission is part of the Welcome Home Boston RFP. We have combined lots 104,106, and 108 Norwell St. Please reference ALT1567565 for the lot consolidation application. On the combined lots we will build three separate buildings that each have 4 residential units.



    Case: BOA-1596034 Address: 108 Norwell Street Ward 14 Applicant: Dorchester Design Collaborative-MOH

    Article(s): Art. 65 Sec. 41 - Off street parking requirements Insufficient parking

    Art. 65 Sec. 08 Forbidden - MFR forbidden Article 65, Section 42Application of Dimensional Req - Two or more dwellings on one lot Art. 65 Sec. 9Residential Dimensional Reg.s - Insufficient lot size Art. 65 Sec. 9Residential Dimensional Reg.s - Excessive f.a.r. Article 65, Section 9Dimensional Regulations - max height exceeded Art. 65 Sec. 9 Residential Dimensional Reg.s - Insufficient front yard setback Art. 65 Sec. 9Residential Dimensional Reg.s - Insufficient side yard setback

    Purpose: This application is part of Welcome Home Boston's Affordable housing development. We are building (3) 4 unit buildings on (3) adjacent lots. Please file this ERT in conjunction with ERT1567569, ERT1595579, and ALT1567565. Please use documents filed with ERT1567569 as part of this application.



    Case: BOA-1596032 Address: 106 Norwell Street Ward 14 Applicant: Dorchester Design Collaborative-MOH

    Article(s): Art. 65 Sec. 08 Forbidden - MFR Forbidden Article 65, Section 42Application of Dimensional Req - Two or more dwellings on one lot Art. 65 Sec. 41Off street parking requirements - Insufficient parking Art. 65 Sec. 9 Residential Dimensional Reg.s - Insufficient lot size Art. 65 Sec. 9 Residential Dimensional Reg.s - Excessive f.a.r. Art. 65 Sec. 9 Residential Dimensional Reg.s - Max height exceeded Art. 65 Sec. 9Residential Dimensional Reg.s - Insufficient front yard setback Art. 65 Sec. 9Residential Dimensional Reg.s - Insufficient side yard setback

    Purpose: This application is part of Welcome Home Boston's affordable housing program. We are building (3) 4 unit buildings on (3) adjacent lots. This application is filed in conjunction with ERT1567569 and ALT1567565. Please use

    documents uploaded with ERT1567569.



    Case: BOA-1592271 Address: 120-124 Babson Street Ward 18 Applicant: James Christopher

    Article(s): Article 60, Section 9 Rear Yard Insufficient - Required 30 feets. Proposed 22'-3"

    Purpose: Applicant seeks to subdivide the existing 55, 854 lot into two new lots LOT A will consist of 43,704 SF and include the existing building on 120 Babson St. LOT B 43 47 Freemont St will consist of 12,150 SF



    Case: BOA-1572056 Address: 91 Radcliffe Road Ward 18 Applicant: Angelo Scippa

    Article(s): Article 69, Section 9 Lot Width Insufficient Article 69, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive

    Article 69, Section 9 Usable Open Space Insufficient Article 69, Section 9 Front Yard Insufficient Article 69, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient Article 69, Section 9 Rear Yard Insufficient Article 69, Section 9 Lot Area Insufficient

    Article 69 Section 29 Off Street Parking & Loading Req

    Purpose: Erect a two family dwelling on a vacant lot.



    Case: BOA-1582882 Address: 305 Chestnut Avenue Ward 19 Applicant: Colm O’Shea

    Article(s): Article 55 Sect 40Off Street Parking & Loading Req - Basement units are forbidden in the basement

    Article 55, Section 9Floor Area Ratio Excessive - Basement units are forbidden in the basement Art. 55, Section 8 Use: Forbidden - Basement units are forbidden in the basement Art. 55, Section 8 Use: Forbidden - Multifamily is a forbidden use

    Purpose: Change of occupancy from two family dwelling to six (6) residential units & 6 parking spaces. Right side, rear addition approx. 15' x 38' 3", 2.5 stories infill rear left corner approx. 10' 6" x 8' 2". Add 3 gable dormers on left side

    11' wide, large gable dormer on right side 30' 3" wide. Nominal fee requested, ZBA required

  8. RE-DISCUSSIONS: 11:30 AM

    Case: BOA-1304433 Address: 10 Thompson Square Ward 2 Applicant: Sing Ming Chan

    Article(s): Art. 62 Sec. 14 Usable open space insufficient Article 62, Section 14 Excessive f.a.r.

    Article 62, Section 14 Excessive height Article 62, Section 14 Insufficient rear yard setback Article 62, Section 29 Off-Street Loading Insufficient - None proposed Art. 62 Sec. 62-29 Off street parking requirements - None proposed

    Purpose: Erect a new mixed use building with commercial space (RETAIL) on first floor and 12 dwelling units above.

    Existing building to be razed under separate permit. *4.10.23: Reduced project scope at ZBA to 12 units and 4 stories

    Reason for Prior Deferral: To continue community process



    Case: BOA-1341015 Address: 146 M Street Ward 6 Applicant: Samuel Sterling

    Article(s): Art 68 Sec 29Roof Structure Restrictions - Roof deck is more than 1 foot above the highest point of roof. Article 68, Section 8 Bldg Height Excessive (Feet) - Max. allowed: 40' Proposed roof deck exceeds it. Article 68, Section 8 Rear Yard Insufficient - Min. requested: 20' Proposed stair at 14'

    Purpose: Add roof deck and stair for exclusive use of unit 3.

    Reason for Prior Deferral: The applicant requested a deferral to meet with the community.



    Case: BOA-1563584 Address: 2 Hillsboro Street Ward 7 Applicant: Brian Goldson-MOH

    Article(s): Art. 65 Sec. 08 Forbidden - MFR use- Forbidden Art. 65 Sec. 08 Forbidden - Basement units Art. 65 Sec. 08 Forbidden - Accessory use parking Art. 65 Sec. 41 Off street parking requirements - Proposed parking in front yard and area >10' Art. 65 Sec. 41 Off street parking requirements - Insufficient parking per Article 65 Zoning regulation Art. 65 Sec. 41 Off-St. Loading Req'mnts - No loading bay area proposed Art. 65 Sec. 9 Residential Dimensional Reg. - Excessive f.a.r Art. 65 Sec. 9 Residential Dimensional Reg. - # of allowed stories has been exceeded Art. 65 Sec. 9 Residential Dimensional Reg. - # of allowed stories has been exceeded Art. 65 Sec. 9 Residential Dimensional Reg. - Lot frontage width Art. 65 Sec. 9 Residential Dimensional Reg. - Rear yard max occupancy >25% requested Art.65 Sec. 42 Appl of Dimensional Reqs - Accessory building Insufficient rear yard setback Article 65, Section 42 Application of Dimensional Req - 4) front wall of building not parallel < 3/4 of required front yard depth Article 65, Section 8 Use Regulations - Artist use -Forbidden

    Purpose: MOH PROJECT Construct a new five story residential building on a parcel created by combining parcels 0703656000 and 0703657000. Building consists of a total of 21 affordable, residential, home ownership units. Six parking spaces will be provided. No loading area will be provided. Zoning relief will be required. (1.9.2024 Updated scope of work to include, Industrial Use: Artist Mixed Use/18 of the 21 units preference for CITY certified artists)



    Case: BOA-1515203 Address: 40-42 Temple Street Ward 17 Applicant: Hau Thi Minh Nguyen

    Article(s): Art.65 Sec. 8 Use: Forbidden - Townhouse Forbidden Art.65 Sec. 8 Use: Forbidden - MFR Forbidden

    Article 65, Section 9.2 Dim Regs: Location of Main Entrance Article 65, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) Article 65, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 65, Section 9 Lot Frontage Insufficient Article 65, Section 9 Lot Width Insufficient Article 65, Section 42.2 Conformity w Ex Bldg Alignment Art. 10 Sec. 01 Limitation of off street parking areas Parking less than 5ft from side lot line

    Purpose: Construct a 3 story attached Five Unit Townhouse. Building to have side porches and will be fully sprinklered. The lot will have 5 new on grade parking spaces at rear and 5 garages (one for each townhouse). Demolish existing Two family building and Single family building on lot (Raze on a separate permits). This lot to be known as 40 46B Temple

    Street.



    Case: BOA- 1538686 Address: 86 Astoria Street Ward 18 Applicant: Natalyn Francis

    Article(s): Article 60, Section 8 Use: Forbidden - Basement Unit Forbidden Article 60, Section 9.3Dim Regs: Location of Main Entrance - Basement unit Article 60, Section 9 Rear Yard Insufficient Article 60, Section 9Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 60, Section 9 Usable Open Space Insufficient

    Purpose: Correct Violations V582833 and V582855. Renovate and reconfigure existing 3 family with addition & extension of living space to attic & basement. Scope includes relocating 3rd unit (previously at second story) to the basement; extending living space. Renovate basement into habitable space as the 3rd unit & renovate attic. Also, enclose rear porches and provide a 2 story addition to the rear, per attached plans. FA/FP included.



    Case: BOA-#1538740 Address: 86 Astoria Street Ward 18 Applicant: Natalyn Francis

    Violations V582833 and V582855. Renovate and reconfigure existing 3 family with addition & extension of living space to attic & basement. Scope includes relocating 3rd unit (previously at second story) to the basement; extending living space. Renovate basement into habitable space as the 3rd unit & renovates attic. Also, enclose rear porches and provide a 2 story addition to the rear, per attached plans. FA/FP included Violation Violation Description Violation Comments 9th 780 CMR 1007Exit and Exit Access Doorway Configuration1007.1.1 Two exits or exit access doorways. Where two exits, exit access doorways, exit access stairways or ramps, or any combination thereof, are required from any portion of the exit access, they shall be placed a distance apart equal to not less than one half of the length of the maximum overall diagonal dimension of the building or area to be served measured in a straight line between them. Interlocking or scissor stairways shall be counted as one exit stairway. [Basement unit with less than half the required exit separation; only a NFPA 13D sprinkler system provided] 9th 780 CMR 1028 Exit Discharge1028.5 Access to a public way. The exit discharge shall provide a direct and unobstructed access to a public way. [Main entry encroaching onto driveway, not providing a dedicated 36" wide obstructed path to the public way.]

     

  9. HEARINGS: 1:00PM

    Case: BOA-1578504 Address: 217 Paris Street Ward 1 Applicant: Marco Castro

    Article(s): Art. 53 Sec. 52 Roof structure restrictions Article 53, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Feet)

    Art. 09 Sec. 01 Reconstruction/Extension of Nonconforming Bldg.

    Purpose: Seeking to erect a roof deck. Roof deck to be accessed by internal stairs and hatch.



    Case: BOA-#1578505 Address: 217 Paris Street Ward 1 Applicant: Marco Castro

    Purpose: Seeking to erect a roof deck. Roof deck to be accessed by internal stairs and hatch

    Violation Violation Description Violation Comments

    9th 780 CMR 1011 Stairways 1011.12.2 Roof Access. Where a stairway is provided to a roof access to the roof shall be provided through a penthouse complying with Section 1510.2 [Hatches provided in lieu of penthouses]



    Case: BOA-1584736 Address: 7-13 Faunce Road Ward 18 Applicant: Sam Shoneye

    Article(s): Article 60, Section 8 Use: Forbidden - MFR is forbidden in a 2F 6000 sub district Article 60, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 60, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) Article 60, Section 9 Usable Open Space Insufficient Article 60, Section 9 Front Yard Insufficient Article 60, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient Article 60, Section 9 Rear Yard Insufficient Article 60, Section 9.3Dim Regs: Location of Main Entrance

    Purpose: Demolish existing structure, erect nine (9) townhouse style residential units with nine parking spaces.



    Case: BOA-1581075 Address: 21 Holbrook Street Ward 19 Applicant: Laureen Sena

    Article(s): Article 9 Section 1 Extension of Nonconforming Use Article 55, Section 9 Side Yard Insufficient

    Article 55, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Stories) Article 55, Section 9 Bldg Height Excessive (Feet) Article 55, Section 9 Floor Area Ratio Excessive

    Purpose: Unit #3: Extension of living space into attic which includes the addition of a roof dormer to accommodate a family room, bathroom, laundry room, and stairs; refer to plans.



    Case: BOA-1590418 Address: 358 Chestnut Hill Avenue Ward 21 Applicant: Josh Fetterman

    Article(s): Article 51, Section 16 Use Regulations - Multi family Dwelling (Bsmt. & First Story) Conditional Article 51, Section 17 Dimensional Regulations - Floor Area Ratio Excessive Article 51, Section 17 Dimensional Regulations - Usable Open Space Insufficient Art. 51.52 Specific Design Requirements - 51 52.1 Street Wall Continuity in Neighborhood Business Subdistricts Article 51, Section 56 Off Street Parking Insufficient Article 51, Section 56 Off Street Loading Insufficient Art.51 Sec.56 Off St Parking Design - 51 56 .5(a) (Tandem Parking) Maneuvering areas

    Purpose: NEW CONSTRUCTION OF A SIX (6) STORY BUILDING WITH THIRTY (30) DWELLING UNITS, GROUND FLOOR LOCAL RETAIL (CORE/SHELL), AND NINETEEN (19) REAR GROUND PARKING SPACES. PROPOSED STRUCTURE TO BE WITHIN THE EXISTING BUILDING'S FOOTPRINT. SEPARATE

    PERMIT TO BE FILED FOR THE DEMOLITION OF EXISTING BUILDING.

     

Back to top